What?
Yeah, I know. It's just...
Here's the thing, y'all: it's tough not being a Christian in America.
Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying I feel persecuted, because I don't. It's not like people are banging on my door and dragging me out in the street and branding me or something. And even if I did start marching around proclaiming my Paganicity, I don't think the dragging and branding would happen. And although it occurs to me that maybe that's because I'm "safe" so far--I'm not easily labeled based solely on appearance and I've studied the Bible and have a healthy respect for Jesus and so can pass in situations in which Christianity is discussed--I still am not necessarily worried about the bad stuff right now. (Right NOW. I'll get to that later.)
But it's wearing to be bombarded with it all the time: the sniveling, lying Glenn Beck talking about restoring America's honor by getting on our knees and praying. The ugly governor's primary race in our state, during which two people tried to out-Christian each other by being the most hateful to gays. The idiotic comments about how Muslims can't tell us what to do in "our country"--including, presumably, Muslim Americans. The eightybluedamnmillion "If you love Jesus, click like" incarnations on Facebook. (Seriously, dude? Jesus is fine. It's YOU that gets on my every last nerve.)
Oh, oh, OH--and THEN I have to hear about how persecuted Christians are because people want to change America. Seriously? Christians in America have no CONCEPT of persecution unless they are A: Quakers (who got kicked out of the Massachusetts colony by the crazyass Puritans) or B: Mormons (who were driven across the country by pissed off Missourians) or C: converted Native Americans who got the shaft in seventy different ways. Today's Christians? Not so much, y'all, not so much.
I mean...we are talking about a single religion driving the legislation and policy of a country, which sounds a lot less like "persecution" and a lot more like "theocracy." In fact, it sounds a great deal like the antithesis of what Thomas Jefferson et al were doing when they were laying down the foundation for our country. A few days ago, I came across a story about the Baptist Association of Danbury, Connecticut. Nutshell: In 1801, this group of men wrote a letter to Thomas Jefferson that basically asked for his endorsement of the idea that a state can't legislate religion, which Connecticut's state Constitution did. The Baptists in Connecticut were putting forth a campaign to oppose this and needed Jefferson's "stamp of approval." In the letter, the BADC wrote: "...religion is at all times and places a matter between God and Individuals - That no man ought to suffer in Name, person or effects on account of his religious Opinions - That the legitimate Power of Civil Government extends no further than to punish the man who works ill to his neighbor." They went on to explain how their state sort of jumped all over this idea, and then elaborated on their fears of what those who meld religion and government would do: ...those, who seek after power and gain under the pretence of government and Religion should reproach their fellow man - should Reproach their Chief Magistrate, as an enemy of Religion, Law and good order because he will not, dare not assume the prerogative of Jehovah and make Laws to govern the kingdom of Christ." Thomas Jefferson replied, in his eloquent awesomeness: "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."
That might be a lot of stuff to throw at you, but the basic gist is this:
BACD: It sucks that we can't have religious freedom in our state. We think that the government ought to let people practice religion the way they want to unless it hurts other people, because this is the definition of religious freedom. We think that people who use religion to legislate run the risk of being so power hungry that they'll try to tell people how to worship.
TJ: Word. I'm down with this and can I get a "what what!" for the wall that separates Church and State in our Constitution?
If you research this further, you'll find that David "I make stuff up" Barton leads a charge against this whole premise by saying that A: the BACD were actually trying to get TJ to convince them that the First Amendment (that had been around for ten years or so) was really real or that B: the wall of separation was only meant to protect churches from government, and not the other way around. Which is, in my educated opinion, a steaming pile of horse crap.
What all this boils down to is that from the beginning, our country was founded on the idea that a person shouldn't be pushed around because of his or her religion. Wanna know one reason why? Massachusetts Colony, baby. In addition to banishing, branding, and hanging folks that didn't worship like them...well, no. That's pretty much it. The founders looked at the giant mess of theocracy that Massachusetts was, mixed it up with the whole Catholic/Protestant awfulness of the country they were leaving behind and said, "Um, thanks, but no. We're gonna go with the William Penn model." In fact, both the Declaration AND the Constitution were driven by ideals Penn shared and worked for. Go here to read about the utopia William Penn envisioned. It failed, but it was a great idea and...dare I say...quite progressive for the times.
I do NOT want our nation to fail the way the Pennsylvania colony did. Wanna know what happened when Penn removed himself from it to deal with family issues and ill health? The charter document was changed so that Jews and non-Christians could not hold public office. This, my friends, is the biggest reason it sucks to not be a Christian in America right now. Annoying FB status updates aside, watching Conservative, Bible-thumping legislators talk about changing the 14th and 10th Amendments, or watching them talk about how Muslims aren't WORTHY of 1st Amendment protections scares the shit out of me. Whether or not the president is a Christian is now, apparently, a voting issue for many people. The media fans the flames (literally, in the case of the douchebag in Florida) and people become so hateful in their religious zealotry that not only do they turn their backs on the Founding Fathers and our Constitution, they turn their backs on their deity. Worse than that, more FEARSOME than that is that when one religion assumes so much political power, the needs and freedoms of those of us who do not practice that religion are threatened. I feel threatened right now. Not persecuted, but wondering if the persecution will come if Beck and Deal and Ramsey and their friends get the power they want.
The wall of separation between Church and State is important. It's important not because I am a Pagan or because you are a Christian or my friend is an atheist. It's important because religious passion is a powerful thing, and it blinds people to all else BUT it. You pair that with a charismatic speaker or a majority in Congress or a few thousand people attending a book-burning and you are looking at a democracy breaker. And even if you are a Christian and you feel comfortable that you will be okay in a theocracy, you better consider what happened to Britain when the monarchy and the Church duked it out for centuries--and what is STILL happening in parts of Britain today.
That wall has been crumbling for years, y'all. And we need to fix it. We need to shore it up and seal it up. And--given Beck's starry-eyed followers and the xenophobic rage I've been hearing about for a month--I think we're gonna need a bigger trowel to do it.
16 comments:
Oh my... you are wonderfully eloquent. I suspect you have studied much history and literature. This is precisely what frightens me about religion and government becoming too intertwined. My problems with Christianity arise not from the religion itself, but those within the religion who choose to focus on the eye-for-an-eye type statements rather than the love-your-neighbor statements in the bible. I fear for all groups who have fought for civil tolerance if this wall is not maintained. If we can't find a bigger trowel then we just need MORE of them! Grout anyone???
You’ve always been a great writer Heather. Nice talent. Of course you know I’m a Christian and you of course stated you are not, but you might be surprised that I agree with “a lot” of what you’re arguing here. As a Christian, my issue boils down to what passes these days as “Christian”. While I’ll never “sit on the throne” so to speak in ultimate judgment of anyone, I can judge rightly by what one claims to believe and their fruits. Glen Beck, for example, is not a Christian. He’s a Mormon. Huge difference as in the way both faiths view the Bible and Jesus Christ Himself. To a Christian, Jesus is our only hope, the one true and living Son of God. If one does not believe that, they cannot be called a Christian. Maybe other labels that falls under religion, but not Christian. So much of the NT is written warning Christians of false doctrines and false prophets, wolves in sheep clothing so to speak. I personally believe the world, (but we’ll just stick with our country) is full of them. Those that use the Christian name, and speak to gain power or influence over others. True Christians, while not agreeing with or condoning certain actions, still show love to those they disagree with. Being a Christian, you obviously know some of the things I would be against. But I don’t hate those that practice them. Heck, I’ve been guilty of quite a few of them myself, and I’m still FAR from perfect. I simply view them as needing the same Grace provided for me through Jesus Christ, and pray they receive it. Yes, that means sharing it when I deem appropriate, but I can’t force anything upon anyone. Only God rules the heart, yet will turn away no one. True Christianity really should not be so concerned with what is going on in the government either. The Bible clearly teaches that God is sovereign over everything, even America, so I sleep well at night. Of course policy is important to me, but what happens, God allows to happen. (yes, it was God’s will that Obama is president. Try saying that to most Christians). But if one believes the Bible, they must believe that too. Christians are told to submit to the governmental authorities, unless told to commit sin of course. (separation of church & state “should” take care of that)
I don’t mean to ramble, and I know your article was mainly about your fears of living as a pagan in a Christian nation. I simply don’t see this as a Christian nation at all. Never has been, never will be. We have freedom here to worship who and as we like, and while I’m happy for that, seeing as it guarantees my right to worship Christ, it negates us from becoming a “Christian” nation. Maybe an over religious nation which of course upsets atheist and such, but there you have it. This is where we live. My belief is that I'm to obey Him, wherever He has placed me, in whatever period of history He has placed me. These are just my thoughts more so than arguments.
Awesome post as usual. Im sharing this.
MD: Thanks, lady. I agree with you about problems with Christianity. The loving, peaceful Christians I know and love have very little in common with the ones causing problems, but their voices get drowned out by the hysteria.
Jeremy: It doesn't surprise me at all, actually. We've always been able to find a middle ground. And while I disagree with you about Mormons and Christianity, I do agree with your points about Biblical teachings and politics. And I agree that this has never been a Christian nation. I, too, cherish the religious freedom we have. I think the divergence in this discussion between us from our religious perspective. When Christianity dominates political discussion, it might be hard for you to view it as the serious problem I see it to be. I'm not faulting you for that--and it might not even be an issue--but I think that might be how many Christians see it.
Oh, and Jeremy, thanks for the compliment and your, as ever, thoughtful and respectful discussion.
sithyogini: Thanks, girl. Share away!
The thing that galls me is that morality has to be a choice or it means nothing. If you choose to behave a certain way, that carries weight.
If you must behave that way, it's a meaningless exercise.
So when a Christian/Taliban/whatever public official forces other people to behave a certain way, they are actually make those people less moral and less religious.
Actions mean nothing without choice. Freedom is a necessary component of holiness.
I'm foregoing what I was going to write today and just linking to you. You said it perfectly.
I dumped those "friends" on fb who said their way was the only way. I was tired of it.
Atheist friend says HI!!!
Atheist friend says HI!!!
whew. wow. yes.
Amen, sister! All the rumors in the Obama race of 'Muslim this and that' made me SO MAD because I was so torn between 'setting the record straight' and screaming 'what the hell difference does it make!?' but in out miserable little theocracy, it does.
I remember polls that shamed me because of their gay bigotry, but even with that "gay" is preferable to 'atheist' in public office (recognizing how rampant homophobia is)... In BOTH cases my response is, "Is the REALLY what Jesus would do?" (you've got to be freaking kidding me)
I love it when you call it as you see it.
Word...
And I'll lend my trowel to the cause.
You know, many Gemran Pagans and Witches look towards the US of A and think "Wow, it's an official religion around there, and Pagans are actually OUT IN THE OPEN!" But I think that, while we only have to deal with people saying, "You're doing magic? As in Harry Potter?" at least our countries have not been infested with all this "City upon a hill" stuff many American Christians seem so infatuated with.
(We do have our very own cross-cultural problems and stupids - has the discussion concerning the latest book of Thilo Sarrazzin reached the other side of the Atlantic Ocean at all?)
For some strange reason, the dominant religion often likes to pretend it is persecuted. Not too different in India either- only, it is Hinduism which is under threat.
Post a Comment